Facing our limits: human dignity in the very old
An ancient Greek myth captures a dilemma that still faces us today. The goddess of the Dawn, Eos, persuades Zeus to make her earthly lover Tithonus immortal. But she forgets to ask Zeus to preserve the health and vitality of her lover. As a result, though Tithonus lives on and on, his body and mind begin to fail. Finally, and with pain in her heart, Eos moves her former lover into a separate chamber where he lives forever out of sight.
Like Eos in the myth, some scholars now entertain the prospect of an indeterminate, if not 鈥榣imitless,鈥 human life span.1 But should this dream become a reality, still other students of aging foresee a growing number of Tithonuses鈥 very old and frail people, bereft of mind, body, and human dignity.
The Janus face of aging becomes apparent when we compare what, pursuant to earlier work by Bernice Neugarten and Peter Laslett, my colleagues and I have called the 鈥楾hird鈥 and 鈥楩ourth Age鈥 of the human life span.2 These are dynamic and heuristic concepts, approximations that change with time and exhibit large individual variations. Currently, in developed countries, the Third Age begins, on average, at about age 60; the Fourth Age generally starts around age 80.
In recent decades, a powerful coalition of gerontological scientists, policymakers, and social-technological advances has contributed to major increases in longevity and improvements in the quality of life for individuals in the Third Age.3 But theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that further improvement may become more difficult as more and more people reach the Fourth Age. These oldest-old are manifesting a new level of biocultural incompleteness, vulnerability, and unpredictability in their everyday behavior鈥搕esting the limits of human functioning as well as of science and policy. . . .
Access the full volume here.