亚色影库app

An open access publication of the 亚色影库app & Sciences
Summer 2005

Passion & mastery in balance: toward good work in the professions

Authors
William Damon, Anne Colby, Kendall Bronk, and Thomas Ehrlich

William Damon is professor of education and director of the Center on Adolescence at Stanford University, as well as a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace. His books include 鈥淭he Moral Advantage鈥 (2004).

Anne Colby is a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, where she codirects the Preparation for the Professions Program and the Political Engagement Project. Her latest book is 鈥淓ducating Citizens: Preparing America鈥檚 Undergraduates for Lives of Moral and Civic Responsibility鈥 (with Thomas Ehrlich, 2003).

Kendall Bronk is a graduate student in child and adolescent development at the Stanford University School of Education. Her current research examines the role a sense of purpose plays in the lives of adolescents.

Thomas Ehrlich is a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, where he codirects the Political Engagement Project and the Foundations and Education Project. He has been a Fellow of the American Academy since 1996. He is coauthor most recently of 鈥淓ducating Citizens鈥 (2003).

Whether or not people belong to a true 鈥榩rofession鈥 as sociologists define the term, they usually consider professionalism to be a quality worth striving for. To call someone a pro implies that the person knows what to do and does it well. Professionals don鈥檛 act naively, make stupid mistakes, or get easily flustered. Professionals have staying power and can be counted on: they 鈥榞o on with the show鈥 no matter how they鈥檙e feeling. It is this attitude that journalist Alistair Cooke had in mind when he said, 鈥淎 professional is a person who can do his best at a time when he doesn鈥檛 particularly feel like it.鈥

Professionalism in any field鈥搈edicine, law, sports, butchery, baking, or candlestick making鈥搃mplies dependable work reflecting a solid mastery of occupational knowledge, standards, and methods. Mastery of this sort matters greatly to clients. Who would go into surgery with a doctor who had not acquired professional skill? Or hire a lawyer with an 鈥榰nprofessional鈥 reputation? Or, for that matter, buy from a butcher who didn鈥檛 know a pork chop from a short rib?

Yet the prestige of professionalism, especially during recent times, has been tarnished by the indifferent, self-serving, and sometimes unethical work of some professionals. No doubt the high-pressure demands of today鈥檚 professional fields have a lot to do with this. In a world of HMOs, mandated billed-hour quotas, and other bottom-line assessment standards, matters of great importance to the lives of clients鈥揳 shady spot on a brain scan, an audit notice from the IRS, a child who can鈥檛 learn in school鈥 may become little more than chores in a professional鈥檚 daily routine. With a frame of mind that used to be summed up (in a pre-inflation era) as 鈥榓nother day, another dollar,鈥 professionals may find it hard to maintain a sense of pride in their expertise, let alone a mission-driven enthusiasm for their daily work.

.  .  .

To read this essay or subscribe to 顿忙诲补濒耻蝉, visit the 顿忙诲补濒耻蝉 access page
Access now